...debate by requesting the tribunal to proceed with a remote hearing in April. Ms. Bhagnani stated that requiring an in-person hearing at a postponed date would create unnecessary delay and...
...Vis Moot Problem highlighted an issue that is not always obvious. When governments buy goods internationally, they conclude international sales potentially subject to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for...
...local legal institutions. When asked about the potential to create a universal (or close to universal) code of ethics in international arbitration, Professor Rogers explained that there do need to...
...does not mean that other participants in the process need not contribute to efficiency. Achieving a truly expedited arbitration will generally require all parties to the arbitration to “buy in”...
...product you have built or the service you are offering will certainly come to buy or use it. But if you build it, sometimes they will not come, something I...
...authorities suggests that generic references are here to stay, though courts are more likely to uphold these in cases where there are same parties entering into multiple contracts. The Supreme...
...crucial role in deciding whether the relief sought in such cases is granted. In this post, I will critically discuss the Singapore Court of Appeal’s recent decision in the case...
...would amount to an intangible creation of the human mind and would thus be entitled to be patented. The increasing scope of patentability by the pharmaceutical industry is codified in...
...respectively. Despite the astronomical damage awards, Russia was able to successfully challenge Yukos’ DCF present net value calculation method and persuade the tribunal that its comparative market capitalization valuation method...
...entering into cross-border M&A transactions. Fifth, arbitration affords the parties in cross-border M&A significant autonomy. In contrast with litigation, where judges are appointed by the state, in arbitration parties benefit...
...on June 30, 2020, which criminalizes separatism, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign or external forces.[1] The articles provide China’s central government with enormous discretion to impose its criminal laws...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.