...can be divided into two stages: Recognition Stage (Secs. 47 and 48): A party seeking to enforce a foreign award has to furnish evidence of the arbitration proceedings, viz. original...
...in the United States” through its long-term agreements with a consulting firm based in Virginia that led to the establishment of Devas and the party’s agreement being carried out. On...
...party did not cooperate in selecting the arbitral panel, the other had to resort to the courts to obtain specific performance of the arbitration agreement. Controversy arose over which country’s...
...party to the Agreement, they did not have knowledge of its existence when they were assigned the Trademarks, and that they were not bound by it.[9] The respondents applied for...
...the parties, it is unlikely that contractors would agree to a choice-of-forum clause in a contract, for each party might be reluctant to accept a choice of the other party’s...
...law was changed by statute, agreements to submit disputes to arbitration were not enforced by the courts. If a party refused to proceed to arbitration, the courts would not compel...
...an adoption of article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.[11] The relevant rule states that an arbitral award may be set aside if the party making...
...Court of the term “arbitrability” in First Options has introduced significant confusion into the law of arbitration and obscured these once-clear governing rules. Whether a party is required to submit...
...unveiled revised Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which opened many opportunities for foreign firms seeking to invest in hydropower, energy efficiency, and methane reduction industries. UZBEKISTAN Uzbekistan is a party to...
...complexity of the disputes.[17] This means that evidence from party-appointed experts will be admissible on all other issues under article 28.[18] In that light, this feature avoids the battle of...
...to place the burden of proof on the party alleging corruption and impose a high standard of proof. The speaker provides examples of cases in which the tribunal imposed a...
...reasons desirable. This section provides the framework and context of theoretical uphill challenges affecting calls for third-party rights and liabilities in arbitration as a result of the classical privity of...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.