Author: Joaquin Garino* Jurisdiction: International Topics: Investment Disputes Costs and Damages Third-Party Funding I. INTRODUCTION With the Unionmatex v. Turkmenistan award,[1] there are now three investor-state tribunals that ordered a...
...Retail.[13] From a theoretical perspective, the Group of Companies doctrine’s encroachment on the principle of party autonomy is justified by the application of the doctrine only where there exists a...
...a multi-party proceedings – to be shaped by arbitral tribunals and courts, which have to interpret and apply the same rules applicable to “ordinary” commercial arbitrations. Italy is an exception...
...of law, going against the mandate of §5 of ACA, which specifically limits such judicial intervention. Third, DAMEPL, as the aggrieved party, filed a Special Leave Petition (hereinafter, SLP) in...
...Action Framework A. International Engagements South Korea has been an active participant in global climate governance, contributing to international legal and policy frameworks.[4] As a party to the United Nations...
...recently begun to point out that this type of international arbitration limits the protection of some human rights, such as the rights to water, health, a healthy environment, and the...
...by recent judicial decisions in England. Notable among the features of the new Act is the primacy it grants to the autonomy of the parties to an arbitration. The Act...
...to grant relief to a party when arbitration proceedings have no longer become convenient for such a party, but rather to assess and inquire into why such a party has...
...preserve a party’s interests. These disputes can be lengthy and expose the parties to post-deal risks longer than they may have intended. Protracted legal disputes in and outside a court...
...with the assistance of a third party, as opposed to arbitration, where an arbitrator is selected to resolve the parties’ dispute—in government procurement contracts. Furthermore, the Guidelines seek to restrict...
...ensure its consistency, its full effect and its autonomy as well as, ultimately, the particular nature of the law established by the [EU] Treaties.”[5] By contrast, the CJEU assigned little...
...of the courts to party autonomy (Part II), and the approach of the courts to arbitration (Part III). It then turns to a consideration of the arbitrator’s dilemma (Part IV)...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.