...Ruling The initial request for enforcement was granted by the first and second-instance courts in Russia. However, the Russian Supreme Court ultimately overturned these decisions on public policy grounds, citing...
Author: Mohit Mishra*, Bhavik Kaushik* Jurisdiction: India Topics: Agreement to Arbitrate Defects and Invalidity Court Decisions Introduction “It is high time that arbitration clauses are phrased with precision and...
...Russia’s stand on sanction-affected arbitrations. While the former tips the scale heavily in favor of Russian courts, the latter puts the petitioner to strict proof for Russian courts to exercise...
...others. The approach adopted by the Canadian Superior Court echoed the concern presented by challenging arbitrator appointments at the stage of enforcement. However, the Court of Appeal of Ontario reversed...
...This type of understanding was followed by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth (1985). In this case, the Supreme Court...
...stand on a rational distinction rather than alluding to law. From the Full Court’s point of view, “an international agreement providing for the establishment of a court responsible for the...
...award.[6] The above cases[7] show that the risk of interference by local courts could exist in every jurisdiction. Also, irrespective of the seat, there could be some variance in decisions...
...competence, to the complete exclusion of Civil Courts, to determine its own jurisdiction. In World Sport Group (Mauritius) Ltd. v. MSM Satellite,[6] the Court established and affirmed the Civil Court’s...
...information redacted and in what types of decisions the institutions consider important to publish. Most focus on final awards, but one institution has chosen to publish only decisions on challenges...
...are therefore enforceable regardless of recognition by a court. The Superior Court of Justice (“STJ”) is the court with jurisdiction to recognize foreign arbitral awards. It may not delve into...
...the Indian courts (“Courts”) have largely adopted a policy of non-interference in the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards except on the limited grounds provided in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...
...for the Supreme Court’s decision in August 2021, wherein it affirmed the validity of emergency arbitration in India.[2] The Supreme Court’s decision to recognise Emergency Arbitration in India has been...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.