...Ruling The initial request for enforcement was granted by the first and second-instance courts in Russia. However, the Russian Supreme Court ultimately overturned these decisions on public policy grounds, citing...
...increasing the substantive reference to domestic court decisions, there is an increasing trend to keep not only the reasoning confidential, but the amount awarded as well. However, for all parties...
...Russian Supreme Court overturned these decisions on public policy grounds, citing Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention and Articles 234-244 of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedure Code. The Supreme...
...others. The approach adopted by the Canadian Superior Court echoed the concern presented by challenging arbitrator appointments at the stage of enforcement. However, the Court of Appeal of Ontario reversed...
...Russia’s stand on sanction-affected arbitrations. While the former tips the scale heavily in favor of Russian courts, the latter puts the petitioner to strict proof for Russian courts to exercise...
Author: Mohit Mishra*, Bhavik Kaushik* Jurisdiction: India Topics: Agreement to Arbitrate Defects and Invalidity Court Decisions Introduction “It is high time that arbitration clauses are phrased with precision and...
...This type of understanding was followed by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth (1985). In this case, the Supreme Court...
...stand on a rational distinction rather than alluding to law. From the Full Court’s point of view, “an international agreement providing for the establishment of a court responsible for the...
...competence, to the complete exclusion of Civil Courts, to determine its own jurisdiction. In World Sport Group (Mauritius) Ltd. v. MSM Satellite,[6] the Court established and affirmed the Civil Court’s...
...award.[6] The above cases[7] show that the risk of interference by local courts could exist in every jurisdiction. Also, irrespective of the seat, there could be some variance in decisions...
...are therefore enforceable regardless of recognition by a court. The Superior Court of Justice (“STJ”) is the court with jurisdiction to recognize foreign arbitral awards. It may not delve into...
...information redacted and in what types of decisions the institutions consider important to publish. Most focus on final awards, but one institution has chosen to publish only decisions on challenges...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.