...award.[6] The above cases[7] show that the risk of interference by local courts could exist in every jurisdiction. Also, irrespective of the seat, there could be some variance in decisions...
...competence, to the complete exclusion of Civil Courts, to determine its own jurisdiction. In World Sport Group (Mauritius) Ltd. v. MSM Satellite,[6] the Court established and affirmed the Civil Court’s...
...are therefore enforceable regardless of recognition by a court. The Superior Court of Justice (“STJ”) is the court with jurisdiction to recognize foreign arbitral awards. It may not delve into...
...the Indian courts (“Courts”) have largely adopted a policy of non-interference in the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards except on the limited grounds provided in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...
...response to the backlog of court cases, noting that these arbitrations are heard mostly be retired judges of the High Courts or the Indian Supreme Court who have been described...
...for the Supreme Court’s decision in August 2021, wherein it affirmed the validity of emergency arbitration in India.[2] The Supreme Court’s decision to recognise Emergency Arbitration in India has been...
...the act before the courts shall be heard otherwise than in open courts, on the application of any party to the proceedings. Further, when such disputes are before the courts,...
...The Court held that private adjudicatory bodies do not fall under Section 1782.[10] The Court reasoned that “[o]nly a governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative body constitutes a ‘foreign or international tribunal’”[11]...
...Disputes. He regularly appears before the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, statutory Tribunals, and Arbitral Tribunals. [1] NN Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd....
...the existence of a trend towards transparency in certain types of arbitrations, the fact that the law on exceptions to confidentiality is still developing in the decisions of the courts,...
...states courts as well as arbitral proceedings.[28] Such observation is shared by an Illinois federal court in Legaspy v. FINRA, the first U.S. court case addressing remote hearings: the applicant’s...
Authors: David W. Rivkin and Eric P. Tuchmann** Published: December 2008 Jurisdiction: United States Topics: Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Enforceability FAA Description: In the Supreme Court’s recent decisions regarding the...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.