...of party autonomy, one issue is how arbitrators are self-selected instead of being chosen by the parties. This takes away one of the advantages of arbitration of appointing, with parties’...
...commonly cited for international disputes);3 among other reasons. Some commentators, however, have argued that parties use arbitration for substantive reasons – to “ensur[e] that the contracting parties’ preferred substantive law...
...Appellants had become parties to the arbitration agreement. Namely, since the Respondents never argued that the Appellants had, in fact, become the parties to the arbitration agreement in accordance with...
...form (without stating the names of the parties and other information that might reveal the parties’ identities) in the Tijdschrift voor Arbitrage arbitration journal,[29] provided that the parties do not...
...that the ultimate decision as to who speaks on behalf of the parties and how they present their case is a matter for the parties and their counsel, not the...
...settled in accordance with international treaties of the Kyrgyz Republic or through international arbitration based on the agreement of the parties. Any investment dispute between a foreign and a domestic...
...to both parties. Parties also have equal power in the constitution of the arbitral tribunal: once a dispute has arisen, each party can appoint an arbitrator and the presiding arbitrator...
...arbitral proceedings, the outcome of such proceedings may also face challenges by the parties, resulting in further time and financial costs. Accordingly, measures should be taken by all parties involved...
...of nine hours between them. The merits hearing was scheduled for five days in April 2021. Vaccines have yet to be widely disseminated and the parties agree that an in-person...
...another Indian entity named Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. (“MSM”).[3] At some point in 2010, a dispute arose between the parties when the respondent alleged that his signatures were forged...
...India v. Competition Commission of India. The Ministry of Railways asserted that the presence of a binding arbitration contract between the parties barred the CCI from intervening, thereby rendering the...
...Arbitration, 1975 (“Panama Convention”), and it is exercised in light of the public policy of the state where enforcement is sought, i.e., the U.S. RELEVANT FACTS I. The Parties...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.