...is available to the tribunal and the parties. This gives parties a certain security as they know that the tribunal’s discretion will draw upon existing doctrine or precedent. The downside...
...European Treaties to preclude “a provision in an international agreement concluded between Member States under which an investor from one of those Member States may […] bring proceedings against the...
...asserting its validity all depend upon the law governed by it. Once the arbitration agreement is executed between two parties, it deploys an arbitral tribunal whose prerequisite is the formulation...
...to both parties. Parties also have equal power in the constitution of the arbitral tribunal: once a dispute has arisen, each party can appoint an arbitrator and the presiding arbitrator...
...of the key advantages of arbitration is the freedom of choice and control given to the parties, known as party autonomy. By the arbitration agreement, the parties exercise a certain...
...obligations can be applied horizontally (to private parties and not just states) despite the presence of an IIA; and (ii) Whether IHRL obligations should be applied horizontally. I will deal...
...Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allows the parties to choose the procedure to be adopted to conduct the arbitration proceedings.[23] Considering that the parties chose one set of institutional rules,...
...ISDS clauses in multilateral and bilateral international treaties of the Kyrgyz Republic Kyrgyzstan has ratified the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States...
...is expected to increase. Post-M&A disputes are common given the manifold risk elements that exist after a deal has closed. While the interests between the parties may (or should) have...
...inter alia, situations in which the arbitrator had an interest in the case, serious enmity towards one of the parties, or specified personal or business relationships with one of the...
...to over-ride any contrary agreement of the parties, as they consciously incorporate institutional rules in their arbitration agreement. This argument, however, ignores the perceived tension between the parties’ selection of...
...However, states have rarely used interpretative statements in practice. India has attempted to issue interpretative statements with limited success. At the same time, in the context of NAFTA, the parties...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.