...complex scenarios. A 2019 Swiss Federal Supreme Court decision in the Electronic electricity meters case highlighted how the CISG interacts with public procurement laws. The court applied the CISG to...
...arbitration should generally work better than national court litigation. Even arbitration at its worst should work at least as well as going to court. And the process for enforcing arbitration...
...Cert Arb (Adelaide), Grad Dip Laws (UQ), Barrister and Solicitor, Supreme Court (Vic), Supreme Court (NSW), High Court of Australia; Lecturer, Deakin University Australia; Senior Assistant, Global Sales Law Project,...
...If either party to the arbitration goes directly to the court without first presenting the challenge to the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral institution, the court must dismiss the case....
...the court; if any person so summoned to testify shall refuse or neglect to obey said summons, upon petition the United States district court for the district in which such...
...Spain concluded in the 1920s, providing for a general compromissory clause to settle any future dispute by a Permanent Conciliation Commission and—failing an amicable settlement—by recourse to the Permanent Court...
...court. Litigation in a “neutral” court may be a possibility, but this raises questions of the ability to enforce the resulting judgment. Indeed, difficulties with the international enforcement of judgments...
...Term of the U.S. Supreme Court was a “happy” event for the American law of arbitration. The Court heard and ruled upon no fewer than four arbitration cases. Prior to...
...preserve a party’s interests. These disputes can be lengthy and expose the parties to post-deal risks longer than they may have intended. Protracted legal disputes in and outside a court...
...person and shall be served in the same manner as subpoenas to appear and testify before the court; if any person or persons so summoned to testify shall refuse or...
...indications of corruption. In the set-aside proceedings filed in the Netherlands, the national court found that the arbitral tribunal imposed a too strict standard in requiring direct proof. The court...
...attributed the deadliness of a torpedo action to infamous Italian court delays, Italian courts’ refusals to immediately defer to the arbitrators’ determination of competence and the lack of an efficient...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.