...of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, which came into force on October 14, 1966 (“ICSID Convention”). The “overriding consideration in creating ICSID was the belief that...
Search Results for : united states
...which helps to “keep the wheels turning.” It is therefore no surprise that institutional arbitral immunity is recognized by various pro-arbitration jurisdictions, including the United States. A. What’s the Worry?...
Time to Tackle the Elephant In the Room? Repeating the ...
...among arbitrators. Examples she cited include the initiative by European states to draft nationality requirements into investment treaties that are tied to the contracting states , and the Racial Equality...
Columbia Arbitration Day 2022: Diversity in International Arbitration and Perspectives ...
...covering the main arbitration jurisdictions (Austria, Belgium, Brazil, China, England and Wales, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, the Netherlands, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States),...
National International Commercial Arbitration – Vol. 32, No. 4
Authors: J. Gillis Wetter* and Charl Prien** Published: October 1991 Jurisdictions: England Sweden United States Topics: Commercial Disputes Arbitral Awards Interest and Costs Costs and Damages ICC ICSID SCC LCIA...
Costs and their Allocation in International Commercial Arbitrations – Vol. ...
...litigation – including expensive discovery, motion practice and tactical delaying stratagems – as practiced especially in the United States. One commentator has observed that “[b]y the beginning of the twenty-first...
Great Expectations: Meeting the Challenge of a New Arbitration Paradigm ...
Author: Mark B. Rees** Published: December 1997 Jurisdiction: United States Topics: Contractual Expansion or Limitation of Judicial Review Description: The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Halligan v....
Halligan v. Piper Jaffray: The Collision between Arbitral Autonomy and ...
...2004 and 2007, there are more than 100 Intra-EU BITs in force, in particular between the former States of the Union and the later-joining States from Eastern Europe. Pursuant to...
The Arbitrability of Disputes Arising From Intra-EU BITs – Vol. ...
Author: Alan Scott Rau* Published: December 1997 Jurisdiction: United States Topics: Arbitral Adjudication Contractual or Consensual Basis of Arbitration Recourse Against Award Generally Enforceability The parties to an international joint...
Contracting Out of the Arbitration Act – Vol. 8 No. ...
...KCAB users is noticeable as well. 30 different countries were represented in KCAB in 2019. 15.1% of the international cases were filed by parties from the United States. The U.S....
KCAB: The Rise of a New Arbitration Hub in East ...
...latter’. The Pope & Talbot tribunal ultimately sidestepped the application of the joint interpretation. In another example, the EU Member States set out their shared understanding on the invalidity of...
Bangladesh’s Regime Change – The India-Bangladesh BIT (2009) and the ...
...one part of a series of reforms designed to increase transparency.[10] ICSID is due to consult with its Member States on the proposal at a meeting in Washington in early...
