...tribunals in Philip Morris Asia v. Australia (“PMA v. Australia”) and in Philip Morris Brands Sarl, et al. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (“PM v. Uruguay”) sided with the two...
Search Results for : Uruguay
...(Vol. 16(3-4) July 2007) Alberto Alvarez-Jiménez, Tobacco Control Measures and International Investment Law After Philip Morris v. Australia and Philip Morris v. Uruguay (Vol. 29(2) December 2018) Gabriel Anaya, The...
Search by Topic
...tribunal in Philip Morris Brands SARL v. Uruguay held that it did not matter whether the measures[17]Uruguay had taken to inform its citizens about tobacco safety were effective – what...
The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty in Future Investment Disputes Related ...
...degree of these arbitral preconditions, acting as impediments to the tribunal’s jurisdiction nonetheless. For instance, in the 2013 decision of Philip Morris v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, the tribunal was...
Whether Contractual Preconditions to Arbitration should be regarded as ‘Impediments’ ...
...was followed in Philip Morris v. Uruguay;[9] second, the proportionality test, as was laid down in Tecmed v. Mexico.[10] Under the former, the exercise of police powers will not give...
Police Powers as a Defence to COVID-19 Liability: Does it ...
...LL.M, summa cum laude) and former business law professor licensed to practice law in Mexico. He is a permanent legal resident of Mexico and Uruguay. His practice focus is cross-border...
Dépeçage in International Commercial Arbitration
...BIT to chew on (July 17, 2020), https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2020/jul/17/economic-measures-against-china-a-bit-to-chew-on-2170843.html. [24] EJIL:Talk!, ‘Police Powers’ and ‘Regulatory Power in the Pubic Interest’ in International Investment Law (July 28, 2016), https://www.ejiltalk.org/philip-morris-v-uruguay-an-affirmation-of-police-powers-and-regulatory-power-in-the-public-interest-in-international-investment-law/. [25] Philip Morris...
India’s ban on Chinese apps: Could India face the fire ...
...attention than its Dispute Settlement procedures, arguably the most important systemic outcome of the Uruguay Round. This is not surprising from the perspective of the WTO itself. The Dispute Settlement...
The Rule of Lawyers and The Ethos Of Diplomats: Reflections ...
...illustrates what this means in practice. The player was banned during the 2014 World Cup, but the proceedings before FIFA’s disciplinary bodies concluded only after Uruguay’s elimination from the tournament;...
The 48 Hours That Can Change the World Cup: Emergency ...
...WTO Dispute Settlement System was established during the Uruguay Round, but built on the foundations established by the GATT in 1947. See generally Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System:...
ВITs in Central Asia: Opportunities and Risks
...J. Solis Tobacco Control Measures and International Investment Law After Philip Morris v. Australia and Philip Morris v. Uruguay Alberto Alvarez-Jimenez Mutual Termination of Sunset Clauses in Intra-EU BITs: The...
Volume 29: Issue 2 (December 2018)
...this is Philip Morris v. Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7 (July 8, 2016), where “Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids” supported the Uruguayan Government financially out of pure altruistic motivation, and not...