...on such information, the arbitral tribunal may struggle to unscramble the scrambled egg or distinguish the evidence obtained through discovery from other evidence. The Tribunal may also be constrained by...
...an award challenged on the grounds that the arbitrator had, against one party’s request, conducted the arbitral proceeding without an evidentiary hearing.1 In addition, extrinsic evidence submitted had been rejected...
...role of evidence, as opposed to argument or other forms of submissions, is to assist the arbitral tribunal in making appropriate findings on disputed issues of fact. Evidence may be...
Authors: Claudia T. Salomon and Sandra Friedrich* Published: June 2014 Description: A. Evidence in International Arbitration The procedures for obtaining and submitting evidence – and the weight it should be...
Author: Daniel J. Rothstein* Published: April 2009 Jurisdiction: United States Topics: Discovery Evidence Description: I. INTRODUCTION Since at least 1989, courts and commentators have debated whether 28 U.S.C. § 1782,...
Author: Laurent Vercauteren** Published: December 2012 Description: I. INTRODUCTION Undoubtedly, one of the key issues of modern litigation and arbitration is the manner in and the extent to which evidence...
...with him or them any book, record, document, or paper which may be deemed material as evidence in the case . . . . Said summons shall issue in the...
...or the evidence or both.” In so ruling, the Second Circuit not only gave renewed vigor to the dubious notion that willful disregard of the law justifies vacatur of an...
Author: Alan Scott Rau* Published: April 2009 Jurisdiction: United States Topics: Discovery Evidence Description: The law of discovery has been invested at times with unnecessary mystery. There are few fields...
...on law and practice in regard to the issuance by arbitrators of compulsory process for evidence to be obtained from non-party witnesses.1 A major impetus for this project was the...
...the most compelling evidence.[14] For instance, in Tokios Tokeles v. Ukraine, the Claimant alleged conspiracy (“nayizd”) that harmed it as a private company.[15] The tribunal applied the “preponderance of evidence”...
...However, the District Court and the Fifth Circuit both disagreed with the magistrate judge’s interpretation and avoided any determination about the parties’ agreement meeting the clear and unmistakable evidence standard.[4]Those...
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.OkColumbia University Website Cookie Notice