Authors: Roman Chapaev and Veronica Bradautanu** Published: March 2008 Jurisdictions: Armenia Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Mongolia Russia Uzbekistan Belarus Republic of Georgia Republic of Moldova Ukraine Azerbaijan Tajikistan Topics: Commercial Disputes...
Search Results for : Mongolia
...in its factfinding quest. Professor George Bermann delivered remarks over the lunch hour. His presentation was entitled “Beijing Shougang v. Mongolia: The Latest ‘Pro-Arbitration’ Error.” In the U.S., it is...
ARIA Report: “Arbitration in Two Worlds: U.S. and Brazilian Perspectives ...
...(1998, 2002) ● Mongolia (2001, 2002) The second group is a more modern type of investment treaty containing regulations against barriers to entry by foreign capital. Japan entered into six...
Investment Treaties and Investor-State Arbitration: The Japanese Perspective* – Vol. ...
...Mongolia, the tribunal granted the claimants’ interim measures application based on its determination that their claims were not “frivolous or obviously outside the competence of the Tribunal.”[1] Other tribunals have...
Interim Measures in International Arbitration: The Case for Applying High ...
...Arbitrator: The Case Against Absolute Arbitral Immunity Emmanuela Truli Current Developments International Commercial Arbitration In The CIS And Mongolia Roman Chapaev and Veronica Bradautanu Arbitral & Judicial Decisions The New...