American Diversity in International Arbitration 2003-2013 – Vol. 25 No. 2

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Author: Benjamin G. Davis*

Published: December 2014


When I was approached to return to issues of diversity in international arbitration, I decided to expand on the methodology I had used in the 2003-2004 period in two earlier articles on American minorities in international arbitration. In the current assessment, I examined American diversity in international arbitration across the broader target population for the American Bar Association’s Goal III diversity efforts: American women, American minorities, American lawyers with disabilities, and American LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning) lawyers. These four groups are the target population described in the American Bar Association’s Goal III: To eliminate bias and enhance diversity. Its two objectives are: 1. “To promote full and equal participation in the Association, our profession, and the justice system by all persons,” and 2. “To eliminate bias in the legal profession and the Justice System.” In addition to sending a survey to 413 international arbitration practitioners of whom I was aware or to whom I was referred, I forwarded it to the ICC Counsel Alumni members of which I am a member, as well as to The International Law Discussion Space listserv, the Society of American Law Teachers listserv, and the Contracts, Dispute Resolution and Minority Groups listservs of the American Association of Law Schools. Further, I greatly appreciate that the Oil-Gas-Energy-Mining-Infrastructure Dispute Management network (“OGEMID”) and ArbitralWomen were kind enough to share the survey in their online spaces. Thus, an attempt was made to reach as broad a group of international arbitration practitioners as possible on all five continents. Finally, based on anecdotal evidence that women may get their first appointment as an arbitrator through the appointment of an arbitral institution, I contacted a diverse group of international arbitral institutions around the world to see if they would be willing to share data on their appointments of members of the target population.

Thirty-four individuals ultimately filled out the survey and three of the international arbitral institutions provided data which will be discussed below.

Download Full PDF

*Associate Professor of Law, University of Toledo College of Law