Author: Alan Scott Rau*
Published: August 2012
I. MONDE RE AND FORUM NON CONVENIENS
Precisely what is a federal court expected to do when asked to enforce a foreign arbitral award – what constraints do the Conventions impose on its normal course of adjudication? Here of course is a vast question – one that would call on all our hard-earned learning – and it is one that I hardly claim to be able to address here.1 But there is one small isolated piece of the puzzle that recurs frequently, and which has in particular been troublesome to the Second Circuit. This is the narrow subject for today’s lesson: What remains of the inherent power of a common-law court to defer or dismiss litigation of a Convention case on the grounds that it constitutes an “inconvenient” forum?
A decade ago a federal district court in Monde Re, “relying on the doctrine of forum non conveniens,” dismissed a petition to confirm a foreign arbitral award, and the Second Circuit affirmed. But the received wisdom of the cognoscenti …
*Mark G. and Judy G. Yudof Chair in Law, the University of Texas at Austin.